MMA webinar covers aftermath of an override failure

The MMA hosted the first webinar in a two-part series focused on the decisions and communication required after a failed Proposition 2½ override.

As outlined in two MMA reports, communities across the Commonwealth are facing a systemic fiscal challenge, causing many to consider an override. The webinar detailed the difficult reality that follows an unsuccessful vote.

Athol Town Manager Shaun Suhoski began by acknowledging that this spring may be the toughest budget season he has endured in his career. To manage his town’s $1.75 million deficit, Suhoski has recommended a multi-year “do the least harm” plan, which still would reduce Athol’s workforce by 8% and cut community services such as summer recreation programs.

Brian Maser, an attorney with KP Law, warned leaders to “have a plan as if the override vote will fail,” because — if it does — there’s a short window of time to comply with obligations under the civil service (Ch. 31) and collective bargaining (Ch. 150) laws, including seniority-based layoffs, bumping rights, and mandated employee hearings.

While the aftermath of a failed override is painful, Suhoski and Maser acknowledged, leaders must prioritize transparency and collaboration to preserve the trust of employees and the community.

MMA Legislative Director Dave Koffman moderated 20 minutes of questions and answers, addressing inquiries regarding how budget cuts were decided in Athol, limitations that campaign finance laws impose on override advocacy, and pay rates when reinstating civil service employees.

• A Bumpy Road: Managing Your Budget Without An Override (PDF)
• Managing Your Budget Without An Override – KP Law (PDF)